Home

This Is News

[the official blog of ThisIsGravity.com]

angermouse

View

Navigation

Advertisement

November 10th, 2008

I originally posted this at DailyKos about a month ago. I figure looking back on it now will make for an interesting exercise, considering what has transpired since ...

I've read the following sentiment here quite often: Winning is not enough.

No. It isn't. It's the beginning.You've got a long fight ahead of you, to make America the very best America it can be. A fight that will (and shouldn't) ever end.

But, regardless of whatever your particular ideological or political stance is, please understand that, first and foremost, winning MUST happen. Because if THAT ONE, at THIS TIME, is elected to what is arguably the highest position of power in the entire planet, EVERYTHING CHANGES.

I repeat: EVERYTHING changes. Not just Washington. Not just America. EVERYTHING.

This is my first diary, so please keep that in mind should I go off the deep end. I know I have a tendency to write far too much about far too little. I apologize for that. I also have a tendency to become overly passionate about certain things. For that, I issue no apology whatsoever.

The purpose of this diatribe isn't to do a premature victory lap. Far from it. Rather, my hope is to hopefully get a few people to take a step back and see just how important this moment is. I know for myself that when I'm deeply invested in something, I get so bogged down in the details, in the day-to-day struggle, on individual stories and ideas, that I forget there's far more at stake than I can perceive at any one time. And while it doesn't cause me to fight less passionately, this temporary shrinking of perspective does occasionally make me fight differently.

First, I should tell you a bit about myself. It matters to the rest of the post. Trust me.

I'm not an American. I'm a Canadian. Except when question of ethnicity arises, in which case I'm a Filipino. Boy do I hate that question. "What are you?" "Canadian." "Well yeah, but where is your family from?"

I'm in my mid-twenties, and spend about as much time on the internet as I do gallavanting about town. More so nowadays, thanks to a publishing job which is a dream come true but also a round-the-clock commitment.

Up until last year, I was not the least bit politically active. I have never voted. Never really saw the use - it was always one shill for another, and what's one vote anyways? Honestly, the only brush I had with politics of any sort came from watching Stewart and Colbert.

Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert. Democracy love 'em. In a fair and just world, those two men will be looked back upon as heroes of democracy. I'm not kidding or hyperbolizing. And fittingly, it was on an episode of The Daily Show, way back when, that I was first introduced to a young black senator with a funny name and a great sense of humour. I don't remember what that particular segment was about, but I do recall thinking to myself, at that moment: I like this dude. And every time he appeared on the show, that feeling was reinforced.

Then, after getting my BA, I took a bit of a hiatus from The Daily Show (and, by extension, my limited exposure to politics of any sort) for a while. It wasn't until last year that I flipped back on.

What I saw changed me. It wasn't a huge moment. It was so small it was practically trivial. But from my experience on this good Earth thus far, I've found that people are usually truly changed not by big isolated leaps, but through an accumulation of tiny steps. It's the little things that push us, slowly, towards wherever. But grand gestures are important too. They make us realize, for good or for ill, just how much we've changed.

Anyways, back to my anecdote. In this 2007 episode of The Daily Show, Jon Stewart mentioned in an offhand kind of way something about Senator Barack Obama's run in the Democratic primary. I vaguely knew that Senator Clinton was in the running, couldn't avoid it really, but this was the first I heard about Obama.

I'll be honest here. That news made me ecstatic. But not in a profound way. I am ashamed to say that I was taken with the Obama candidacy for extremely shallow reasons. I latched on to Obama not because I thought he would have a chance to win, but because 1) I already liked him and 2) he was a novelty. Novel because of the colour of his skin. And I empathized with that. My initial support of Obama had everything to do with his - and my - being an ethnic minority, and had nothing at all to do with policy or even ideology. I probably would have been similarly taken with Billy Dee Williams or Mr. T if he had decided to run.

Tiny steps.

From that admittedly inauspicious start, I began to follow the campaigns. I began to investigate policy and positions and the political dynamics not just of your country but of mine. I watched, from the sidelines, as the Obama campaign gained momentum and support in amounts few contemporary political figures have amassed and in ways none have ever utilized quite so masterfully. Here and in other places, I've seen and heard the sentiments and emotions Barack Obama elicits in Americans of every stripe. I've witnessed for myself how the idea of a President Obama would be received by the world outside of America.

And I've come to realize something.

Barack Obama has always insisted that this election, this moment, isn't about him. It's about you.

He's half right.

Everything he said about you, the American people, is absolutely true. What's coming won't be possible without you.

But it isn't just about you, either. What Senator Obama failed to mention - either because he doesn't recognize it, or, more likely, out of humility - that this election, this moment, IS about him. Or rather, it's about what he represents. Arguably, anybody could be waving the flag that we have hitched to his wagon, although it is true that Obama - because he is as imperfect and flawed and powerful and unique and human as he is - makes it that much easier for us to make him our standard-bearer. But it's the idea surrounding the man, the hidden standard upon which we lay our hopes for a better world, that makes this election, this moment, matter so very much more than arguably any that have come to pass.

But what is this idea I'm referring to? Well, it's not actually a single concept. Neither is it a collection of completely disparate notions. Rather, it's a number of ideas that all lead back to a single theme.

The theme is a simple one. Simple but powerful, I think. Repeat after me:

THE WORLD HAS CHANGED.

Everything we thought that (America, Canada, the Planet Earth) was like - politically, economically, culturally, socially - is proving to be wrong. It's possible to be right about a couple of aspects of life in the 21st century but the scale of your/my/our ignorance of the others is being quickly revealed. What is true for the pundits is true for everyone. Even the best and brightest among us are just scratching the surface of what this world has become, and what this world has the potential to be.

I don't know about you, but the thought of being wrong about so very many things has become a source of incredible hope for me. But that's because I used to be a very cynical person.

What follows is a list of some of the things I gleefully admit to being wrong about. Conveniently enough, these are also things that an Obama presidency would represent. Please add to it as you see fit:


1) The Power of Technology

I always considered the web as a convenient method of transmitting data. Now I know better. The internet destroys barriers to perspective. It is a connection to people. Not just the notable people we see on TV or read about in the paper, but anyone and everyone who has access, all over the world. It is a resource of knowledge and ideas and hopes and dreams, not just from one small corner of America or one tiny Pacific island, but from every corner of this planet. It is a conduit that allows people to realize just how much the rest of the world affects them - and, perhaps, how they can affect the rest of the world.

2) The Power of Youth

I do not claim to speak for all young people, but I know that as a young person I've often felt intimidated and powerless in the face of serious political discussion. To me, politics was a sophisticated adult game, full of code words and obscure details and references that went straight over my head because I wasn't alive when JFK was assassinated. When I did try to insert myself into a political conversation, I can't tell you how many times I faced derision because I knew nothing of, say, Ronald Reagan's policy positions. Apparently I should've been watching CNN instead of Sesame Street. So I grew up with the belief that those interested in politics, and therefore politicians, had little regard for me - and I treated them with the same courtesy.

Enter Stewart and Colbert. Enter the internet.

The first two made learning about politics fun. The latter made it easy, and infinitely less intimidating. Most importantly, they make me - and people who were like me - feel proportionately more powerful. Like we matter. Like we make a difference. Like some of the things we are generally decried for - our hip Comedy Network-infused skepticism, incessant text messaging, and frivoloous online addiction - are making a contribution.

Like, say, unprecedented youth voter registration, in numbers so huge that pollsters won't even bother to take them into account because nobody wants to dare predict what kind of impact such a massive new demographic would entail.

3) The Power of the Other

Race, colour, culture. These are concepts that are taught, not inherent. I know this from personal experience, being one of only a handful of Asian children in a school full of Italian and Portuguese and Hispanic kids. I didn't have to start putting up with racial shit until around the third grade. People aren't born with ideas of cultural difference in their heads. Someone puts them there.

For the longest time, we have been led to believe that America is a fundamentally white country, interspersed with small ethnic communities. Guess what. Those small ethnic communities have gotten a lot bigger since we last looked. Just like the youth vote, the ethnic vote is probably underrepresentative of actual population, and for the same reason. They felt they didn't matter, that the political process was indifferent to them and their needs, that their voices didn't count for anything.

It's hard to continue to feel that way when the most powerful single voice in the world could potentially belong to someone treated as 'other', just like them. I'm not saying it's the only reason an AA man or a Latino woman or an Asian youth would vote in this election. But it sure fucking helps. Believe me.

To all children, of all races and genders and creeds and persuasions who have ever dreamed they could be an astronaut or a prima ballerina or yes, even the President of the United States of America: hold on to your dreams. Because the people who tell you differently are about to be proven liars.

4) The Power of America

Let's face it. We Canadians have a love/hate relationship with you folks down south. That whole George W. Bush thing didn't help matters much (seriously, what the hell was that all about?). But for all the sniping coming from both sides of the border, we - or at least, I - have come to recognize that America, or at least the ideal you attempt to uphold, is something that the world desperately needs.

I'm talking about Freedom, baby. About a place where people can come together and learn to co-exist in relative harmony. Where said co-existence is encouraged. Where, through common assent, the people who thrive on hate and fear and selfishness are decried and marginalized for the worthless human beings that they are.

Sure, America didn't invent Freedom. And some places have arguably handled it a bit better. But you folks were the ones who, with your often overbearing but occasionally inspiring swagger, took it upon yourselves to place the mantle of Freedom squarely upon your own shoulders.

People around here, and I suspect elsewhere, say all the time: who do Americans think they are, to tell the world what it should do? Hell, I've said it myself. But some things - like Freedom - are too important to go unspoken. And someone needs to speak for it, loudly and with gusto.

Nobody, and I mean nobody - not Americans, not Canadians, not Morroccans, not nobody - could ever possibly hope to fulfill that promise or live up to that responsibility. But God Damn America, at least you fucking try. You're not our ideal candidate, but of those who are in the running you're the best we've got. We're under no illusions. You're going to dissapoint us. Often. But that might be okay, as long as you achieve at least some of what you promise.

5) The Power of the People

This election isn't about Barack Hussein Obama. It's about you, the American people.

And it's also about me, and them, and they, and everyone. We've all got a stake in this, every one of us who felt that we were powerless to change anything. Because we were young. Because we were different. Because we thought we were alone.

A President Obama would mean that Americans of all different stripes came together, by dint of their own blood, sweat, and tears, and decided to let a black man lead them (if he were a woman and gay and an atheist, even better - but you have to work with what you have). My friends, this wouldn't mean the shattering of a glass ceiling. It would mean moving to a completely new building, one you've never had a chance to explore before.

Argubly, America, you've already made that move. Though a part of you has been pretending that your building is still the same one from twenty years ago, that the world outside is still the same as it was back then, the rest of you has been inching closer and closer to the truth. After all, it's the little things that push us, slowly, towards wherever.

But grand gestures are important too. They make us realize, for good or for ill, just how much we've changed.

That is why Barack Hussein Obama must win. Because it will prove just how powerful each and every single one of you truly are. And - through the technology we have at our disposal - how little it truly takes to give anyone, of any nation, the same amount of power. How powerful we can all be TOGETHER, at this moment, at this point in history, if we want something badly enough.

Whether you believe in fate or coincidence, you the American people have been presented with an opportunity of monumental proportions. Don't you dare let it slip. We're counting on you.

September 3rd, 2008

Why is it that trolls on political news sites (I'm not talking about partisan havens like DailyKos or FreeRepublic; I mean newspaper sites and so forth) are almost exclusive Repbulican?

I'm not calling them trolls because I disagree with them. I'm calling them trolls because they can't form cogent arguments and instead resort to taunts, blatant mistruths and ad hominems at every single turn.

Seriously, I'd like to know. Because it's been my experience (up here, at any rate) that idiocy is independent of ideology. And yet your breed of unfortunates all seem to ride red elephants. Why is that? I'm asking in all honesty, and I'm curious to hear theories. Somebody should do a study.

Thoughts?

***

Oh, and my two cents on Sarah Palin: Her selection is absolutely disgusting. Cynical. A blatant disrespect not just to voters but to America and its ideals. I'm aware - if not agreeable - to the fact that campaigning is a winner-take-all process. But foisting campaign stunts to win an election, AT THE INARGUABLE DETRIMENT OF YOUR FUTURE ADMINISTRATION, is exactly the kind of shitbaggery that destroys countries. If McCain is going to lob a Hail Mary, he may as well have selected Paris Fucking Hilton as his running mate. After all, she has bigger name recognition than Sarah Palin does. And a better energy policy too.

***

One last thing before I go to sleep. I'm tired of journalists. Really. Especially when they speak about journalistic integrity.

There was never any such thing. Don't quote me Cronkite, or old school AP. Journalists have always been political, even when they've pretended not to be. Nothing has changed, except perhaps their hypocrisy has become more apparent.

What sets the old school, respect-worthy journalists apart from the hacks you see now is that the former were, despite their political ideology, humanists at heart. They didn't hesitate to call bullshit for what it was, even if that bullshit was being shovelled by one of their bosses. They had spines.

The folks you see on CNN, MSNBC, etc? Not in the same league. I won't call them idiots because that would excuse them from what they do. And I refuse to give them the benefit of the doubt. Not when they sit there, nodding along to every single blatant lie and smear and talking point and bit of spin without once, just once, saying "SHUT UP YOU LYING LIAR. SHUT THE FUCK UP. YOU ARE DESTROYING MY COUNTRY AND I WILL NO LONGER SIT IDLY BY AND ALLOW YOU TO."

But they won't. Or "can't". Journalistic integrity won't let them.

Fuck you, Anderson Cooper. Jack Cafferty is more reporter than you'll ever be. Even if he is a Republican.

August 29th, 2008

Yes You Fucking Can.

Add to Memories Tell a Friend
"America, we cannot turn back. We cannot walk alone. At this moment, in this election, we must pledge once more to march into the future. Let us keep that promise -- that American promise -- and in the words of Scripture hold firmly, without wavering, to the hope that we confess."
- Barack Obama, August 28, 2008


I can say, with the greatest sincerity, that if I had a leader like the one you COULD HAVE IF YOU JUST FUCKING CHOSE HIM, I would follow without hesitation - not because I believe he will never falter, but because he is counting us to show him the way when he does.

Do not let this moment pass you by, America. This isn't just about you. The whole world needs you to get this right.

August 5th, 2008

I'm Not Panicking But ...

Add to Memories Tell a Friend
I just came up with an amazing ad to convince Americans to move to Canada in 2009:

Come To Canada!
... where it's impossible to vote for Republicans.


Here's hoping it doesn't come to this.

July 27th, 2008

Extremely Premature Preview

Add to Memories Tell a Friend
... I'm kind of a tease, I know. But I do want to prove that my new project is - if not anywhere close to becoming concrete - then at least in the conceptualization stage.

Courtesy of my artist:

July 25th, 2008

Feist, Watchmen

Add to Memories Tell a Friend
Finally got around to listening Leslie Feist's album 'The Reminder'. Good stuff. I got caught up in the iPod commercial, same as anyone, but what really sold me on her was her appearance on Colbert. Something about an attractive, intelligent women with a great voice wearing a button-down and a tie makes me happy.

I've also got 'The End is the Beginning is the End' trapped in my echo chamber head, thanks to the Watchmen trailer preceding The Dark Knight. I have my reservations about how that film is going to turn out, if only because Zack Snyder directed 300 - and, fun as it was, it was also a big stupid movie. Watchmen is fucking literature. Most of its appeal stems from the fact that it's so challenging. Remove that challenge and what do you get? A movie about ripoffs of Charleston Comics characters no one gives a shit about.

Back to writing.

July 24th, 2008

Still Breathing

Add to Memories Tell a Friend
Just dropping in to say hello to everyone. Sorry I haven't been around. Lots of things to adjust to.

Life isn't perfect, but it is interesting:

1) I'm working full-time now with not one but two publishers. Who share the same office space, but still. Am I ecstatic about my job(s)? You bet your sweet internet ass I am. It's a lot of work, but considering the kind of stuff I have to do, the people I work with, the people I get to meet, it's all worth it. So worth it.

2) Remember that Gravity spin-off I brought up a few months back? I really think it's going to happen. An awesome, awesome artist is actually willing to put up with my crap and work with me on this thing. No timeline on when it gets done, but when it does you'll all be the first to know. If there's anything of hers you like, by all means buy. And if you'd like her to do a commissioned work for you, go! I'll tell you now she's a dream to work with.

3) An article at HuffPo said something I know a lot of people are thinking but are secretly ashamed/afraid to say: With Barack Obama receiving as much fanfare as he is on his whirlwind international tour, it really does seem almost *almost* like this man is auditioning not just for President of the USA, but also President of Earth.

He's really kind of amazing.


So yeah, I'll try to be around more. Read Canadian!

April 15th, 2008

(no subject)

Add to Memories Tell a Friend
so i've got this thing up. drop on by, comment. link if you want.

i'll try to find stuff on the election controversy in zimbabwe soon. also darfur. and some happy stuff in between.

April 14th, 2008

(no subject)

Add to Memories Tell a Friend
Just some notes after watching the Compassion Forum on CNN and reading some more crap on the Democratic campaigns online:

1) Why are so many Clinton supporters convinced there's an anti-Clinton media conspiracy? Do any of these dumb fucks watch CNN?

2) I'm detecting, from some quarters, resentment towards young voters and their potential influence on the upcoming vote. Apparently the feeling is that young peope shouldn't have a say in the direction their country takes far into the future, when many of the current voters are dead.

I'm currently cooking up a new blog to stash all my social/political/crrent events commentary, so stay tuned for that. I'd love it if you guys check it out when it's done, start up some discussion, maybe even contribute things you find interesting. Talking with you guys about the real world has just been a blast, and I want to keep it up.

I need a snappy name for the blog. Ugh. Help! Any ideas?

Edit: One last note. Which way are Asian-Americans leaning, voting-wise? Oh well. According to CNN, there aren't any Asians in America.

April 12th, 2008

Are you fucking kidding me.

Senator Obama comments that many Pennsylvanian voters undergoing economic hardship are "bitter". That because of their economic situation (look it up; it ain't pretty), they are angry which is why they turn to guns, religion, and bashing on illegal immigrants and free trade.

If you listen to Clinton, McCain, and half the douchebags on CNN, apparently calling people bitter is the same as telling them to go fuck their mothers. They would have you believe there are no bitter voters at all. None.

In fact, voters these days are so happy with the way the past couple of administrations have handled things that INCREASING NUMBERS HAVE NOT BOTHERED TO VOTE AT ALL. Because you're not bitter, right?

Seriously guys. Vote Obama, if only to prove to Washington that y'all aren't a nation of morons who are easily swayed by lies and hypocrisy and pandering to the least common denominator. The longer you let them get away with it, the longer they'll keep doing it. So put an end to it.

April 10th, 2008

Ugh, Gravity

Add to Memories Tell a Friend
I'm sure y'all probably think I've pretty much given up on Gravity. 

That's not true. While I really really can't work up the will to draw anymore, that doesn't mean I'm tired of my characters and their stories. It's just ... ugh. The longer you leave something dead the more used to it being dead, yanno?

But like I said, I think there's still something to salvage there. I'm been kicking around an idea for a while for a Gravity spinoff which will feature some familiar characters. It won't exactly be Gravity, but it'll still be set in the same universe. The problem is, I for the life of me just don't want to do the art for it.

Would you guys be interested at all in a spinoff series composed of short online stories, posted at my site? Unless of course someone wants to volunteer to do some kickass drawings for me, in which case, hell yeah, let it be COMICK, but I sincerely doubt anyone would want to work with an embittered hack such as myself.

Here's the concept: It's called 'A Line In The Sand'. It's a Western. And it's set in Hell.

Anyone interested in drawing this? Or reading this? The fomer would be three shades of awesome but the latter is also good (and easier).

April 6th, 2008

Having over the years properly distanced myself from whatever nostalgia might cloud my opinion today, and having watched the second Star Wars trilogy again over the course of this weekend, I can confidently and unhesitatingly make the following statement:

GEORGE LUCAS WRITES TERRIBLE, TERRIBLE DIALOGUE.

I can't count how many times I've cringed listening to anyone say anything in the movies. People pound on the actors but really, what could they do with such a worthless script?

There's just so much that's awkward, I don't know where to begin. Terrible word choice, poor phrasing, ridiculous statements ... I understand that Lucas could've written the script in fucking pictograms and the movies would've still earned more than the Gross National Product of Mozambique, but still - what happened to professional pride?

You have to give credit to Haydn What'sHisFace for being able to pull off a line like "Padme ... you are everything soft ... and smooth," with a straight face. Seriously. It takes a real fucking actor to say something like that and not break out in Jimmy Fallon hysterics. Oscars all around!

PS - NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

April 1st, 2008

I take back what I said about Wal-Mart. Apparently even they aren't invincible to the force of nature known as The Public Relations Disaster. The news is that they've backed down on theĆ­r suit of Deborah Shanks and are actually allowing her family to keep their money.

Don't fall for it, I say. I'm still never going to shop there again. Why should they be rewarded for doing something that they should've done in the first place? And folding on this case just because of PR flak isn't the same as turning a new leaf, nor does it excuse them from all the other things they've done.

People say we shouldn't expect any different from a large corporation. In my opinion, that sort of passive cynicism allows them to get away with this kind of bullshit. But then again, I'm writing this on a laptop I bought at Best Buy, and thus am a hypocrite. Awesome!

March 29th, 2008

Wal-Mart: So Evil It's Sexy

Add to Memories Tell a Friend
If you haven't heard of the Debbie Shanks case, take a gander at this.

You have to give props to Wal-Mart for being so secure in its hold over the general public that it honestly doesn't care how evil it looks. Even a mostly evil corporation would at least make concessions on this one case in order to avoid a public relations firestorm.

But not Wal-Mart. Nope! Wal-Mart is SO fucking evil they don't care about public opinion at all. Their cabal of demonic executives are probably sitting in some subterranian lair right now, supping on lamb's blood served on the breasts of nubile young virgins, laughing at this whole controversy and how easily it'll all blow over because millions of people enjoy buying cheap merchandise too much to do anything about it. The fact that Wal-Mart has such a terrible record with regards to how it treats employees, and yet continues to earn ever larger piles of money, is proof of this.

Oh, and I'm by no means an advocate of serial murder, but if ever you were looking for anything to fill you with a violent hatred of humanity, just read the comments at the end of the CNN story linked above. I'm talking specifically about the people who support Wal-Mart's position. "Well, the rules are the rules," they say. Because, as we all know, what's legal must always take precedent over what's right.

Where's Batman when you need him?

March 27th, 2008

Another AYFKM

Add to Memories Tell a Friend
By the by, AYFKM = Are You Fucking Kidding Me.

Someone please explain to me what 'The Liberal Media' supposedly is. I was under the impression it only applies to those media outlets that endose liberal ideologies, but I've now encountered people who consider ALL of the media 'liberal'. In fact, I've seen CNN and FOX FUCKING NEWS referred to as part of The Liberal Media. And that jut confuses me. I don't know. Maybe I need to get off the Internet.

***

You may wonder why, as a Canadian, I give so much of a shit about another country's election. Well, it's for the simple logical reason that I don't believe my country exists in a bubble, and that things which go on in other countries CAN and DO affect me. I'm a citizen of this good Earth as much as the people of America or Afghanistan or Antarctica (all 50 of them!) are, so I think it's my business what happens wherever because eventually, somehow, in some way, that shit's going to trickle over to me.

Just as an example: Air pollution and climate change affect me and will affect my children (should any woman ever stoop to tolerate my touch) even more. The current US president's opposition to the Kyoto Protocol was one of the major reasons why those resolutions fell flat. I can only hope the next one will be a litle more forward-thinking.

Let's be clear about it. Whoever turns out to be the leader of one of the most influential and powerful nations in the world is a BFD (Big Fucking Deal) no matter who you are or where you live. Any Iraqis who didn't care about the 2004 US election probably care at least a little about the 2008 US election.

And this isn't just an American dealy-o. If, let's say, China actually had democratic elections, or made transparent the political process within their Communist party, I would rail on and on about that too. You kind of have to give a shit about the leadership selection of a nuclear nation whose standing army numbers over ONE BILLION SOLDIERS and which has had a pretty poor human rights record over the years. Unfortunately that sort of information just isn't readily available.

I could be accused of meddling, and rightfully so, by people who feel that I shouldn't involve myself in what is ultimately a choice the American people have to make in their own best interests. But when the peope of my family, my community, my city, my country, my planet, WILL feel the repercussions of that choice for years to come, doesn't that mean what happens is in my best interests too?

Ugh. It's 5 AM.



... Are you fucking kidding me?

So let me get this straight (and this goes for the 19% of Obama supporters who would do likewise if HRC were nominated):

You folks are willing to vote for for someone in John McCain, whose platform policies appear to be totally contradictory to your preferred candidate's, over someone whose platform policies are virtually indistinguishable from your preferred candidate's?

Jesus Christ. I don't understand how anybody can not see how profoundly retarded that is.

March 24th, 2008

(no subject)

Add to Memories Tell a Friend
Just watching Lou Dobbs on CNN. Saw something hilarious.

Mr. Dobbs appeared to be in complete disbelief that racism still exists in America. He stated that in the past four years he hadn't heard a single racist statement from any of his white friends or acquaintances, and he feels that Barack Obama's speech on race actually had nothing to with race relations (which Dobbs believes, don't forget, are perfectly fine) and everything to do with softening the impact of the Reverend Wright controversy.

Don't get me wrong. Obviously the latter was certainly an important factor in Senator Obama's oration. But the main thrust of the speech, that Americans in general still have difficulty discussing race in an open and constructive way and often don't understand or are even completely unaware of viewpionts besides their own, is 100% true. Lou Dobbs, with his eye-bulging jowl-flapping incredulity that racism is still an endemic social problem, only proves Senator Obama's point.

Why is it usually the case that the people who can benefit most from an idea are the ones who don't/won't understand it?

March 21st, 2008

As you guys know, I've been following the Democratic campaigns a bit over the past few days.

I'm still trying to wrap my head around certain issues, and I feel if I can get some of those issues cleared up I'll have a better understanding of American socio-political dynamics and therefore a better understanding of the electoral process.

So for those of you who live down south, can you please explain to me why so many Americans are so sensitive to any criticism of their country - even when it's made by fellow Americans?

This isn't just patriotism. People say Canadians aren't patriotic because we're all too eager to point out the flaws in our country. But anyone who's witnessed a CANADA RULEZ AMERIKKKA LOLOLOZ!!!!111 pissing contest will know that we do indeed love our country. If we are eager to criticize Canada, it's because we want it to improve and have faith in its capacity to do so. It's not because we're unpatriotic. Far from it. 

I don't doubt for a second that most Americans who criticize the USA do so for the same reason we do - because they have faith in what their country should represent and hold hope that it may yet live up to those ideals. Nor do I doubt that Reverend Wright considers himself a red-blooded American and a patriot. He was a Marine, for crap's sakes. And yet, because of some admittedly indiscrete word selection, so many are willing to jump on him as a hate-spewing racist (despite the clearly visible white members of his congregation - watch those stupid clips closely), and - worse of all - an anti-American traitor.

I don't understand this level of sensitivity at all. I've heard some pretty terrible things said about Canada. Fuck, I've said them myself. But not once have I heard anyone respond with 'Canada - love it or leave it'. Nobody has told me to go back to the Philippines.  For the most part, people agreed with the criticism and didn't question patriotism.

What's up with that? What's up with the vitriol? When I see someone calling John Stewart a traitor - John Stewart, for fuck's sake - that doesn't look like patriotism to me. But it sure smells like insecurity.

So yeah. If someone could at least try to explain the mindset to me, I'd really appreciate it. I look forward to watching campaign coverage without scratching my head/punching my suckerfish.

March 20th, 2008

Continuing to read reaction and commentary to Barack Obama's speech (find it on Youtube if you haven't seen it yet - over a million people have!)

Still disgusted.

I know I should keep in mind the old (not really old but meh) adage that the loudest, most insistent opinions posted on the internet are usually representative not of the majority but rather of the insane minority. Scour through wikipedia and note how much longer and more in depth the articles on, say, Star Wars are than on, say, international politics. That does not mean Star Wars is more important than international politics. It just means that some people who like Star Wars happen to like writing about Star Wars on the internet ALOT. And the same can be said for those who believe that Barack HUSSEIN Obama is an anti-patriotic Muslim whose sole purpose in pursuing the presidency is to instigate HELTER SKELTER, the ultimate race war predicted by Charles Manson (and the Beatles apparently) in which the wicked white majority are finally destroyed by visible minorities.

But still. Disgusted.

It's not the comments by the insane few that bother me so much (although they bother me a lot), as the simple fact that one of the candidate's race is such a BIG FUCKING DEAL. I just can't muster up much hope for a country in which the mainstream media focuses on some video clips of a pastor taken out of context, as opposed to, I don't know, THE LOOMING RECESSION YOUR CURRENT PRESIDENT HAS DRAGGED YOU INTO. I don't know, it seems to me that kind of story would be more pertinent in the steps leading up to a presidential. But what the hell do I know.

I mean, seriously. What the fuck? Don't give me nonsense that no country would vote a member of the visible minority in as leader. Argentina had a president of Japanese descent, for fuck's sakes. ARGENTINA.

And while Canada has never had a Prime Minister of ethnicity or an elected female Prime Minister (Kim Campbell assumed leadership after Brian Mulroney resigned/retired), I can state with some conviction that neither race or gender would have as much significance in a Canadian election as in, say, an American one.

I'm not going off on another CANADA RULEZ AMERICA LOLOZ!!!!111 tangent. I weary of such rants, and will often point out my own country's failings with glee just for the sake of fairness and argument. What I'm trying to do is point out a fundamental difference between our nations that exists, for whatever reason. I'm not trying to figure out why. I have neither the background, the knowledge, or the time. I'm just making an observation.

The reason I say most Canadian voters or even the Canadian media wouldn't make a big issue out of gender or race (aside from the historic implications) is because we've already proven we're willing to ignore our candidates' language and culture. And up here, language and culture are a BIG FUCKING DEAL.

I've read from a few social commentators that, regardless of what many (including Senator Obama himself) will attest, there are in fact two Americas, divided by race. I can't comment on the accuracy of those statements, having never lived down south, but let's for the sake of argument say that they're at least partly true.

Believe it or not, a similar situation existed (and may or may not continue to exist, depending on moods) up here in Canada. There's an English Canada and a French Canada. There's been historical conflicts between both groups, proven instances of oppresion and atrocity, and animosity and bigotry that simmers on both sides to this very day.

Ugh. I could've - should've - included First Nations peoples in this discussion. But that's a whole other conversation that deserves its own space.

Anyways, back to the Two Canadas and the Two Americas. The fundamental difference between the Two Canadas and the Two Americas (besides being split along language and culture as opposed to skin colour) is that the Two Canadas are legally divided and geographically demarcated. Quebec is a province populated by a francophone majority and administrated under francophone policies. There are language laws in Quebec which many have interpreted as discriminatory towards anglophones, immigrants, and aboriginals. So defined are the seperations (and tensions) that some Quebecers once formed a bona-fide terrorist organization (the FLQ) and many Quebecers have pushed for sovereignty, if not outright independence.

We're not talking about a few crazy Republic of Texan-ers here. We're talking about multiple referendums involving the entire provincial population (the second largest population in Canada), the most recent of which took place in 1995, where a motion for Quebec to officially secede from Canada was defeated by the bare minimum of votes: 50.58%. Our country came *that* close to being torn apart on the basis of language and culture.

So, as mentioned before, if anything should affect our national elections as much as race appears to affect the American nominations, it would be the combination of language and culture. But for some reason, it never is. The media doesn't make much of a deal of it. Francophone nominees from Quebec don't have to deal with questions of culture or patriotism, this despite the existence of parties like the Bloc Quebecois, which participated in national elections with the intention of electing a Prime Minister who would immediately make Quebec independent. Despite these issues, we've still elected Prime Ministers from Quebec: fairly tepid Jean Chretien, noted douchebag Brian Mulroney, and controversial national icon Pierre Trudeau.

Only a bigot or an imbicile would deny that Senator Obama is facing racial and cultural bias in his campaign efforts. That he actually has a chance at winning seems to surprise most, disappoint many, and infuriate some.

I find this fact remarkable. Can you imagine how much of a longshot he would be if what has happened between the Two Canadas had happened between the Two Americas?

Picture this: Some time within the past twenty years a Black Panther somehow got elected governor in, say, Alabama. S/he passed a series of laws which could be construed by the white population as discriminatory, and then managed to convince 49.42% of Alabama's population to secede from the Union?. 

I don't know about you but I can imagine the backlash against the African American population, let alone an African American who subsequently dares to run for the highest office.

My hypothetical never happened, and yet Senator Obama still has to put up with grief of the most putrid kind. People implying he's a secret Muslim because of his middle name and ancestry, a secret anti-American because of his pastor and his church and his community ... AND THESE INANITIES THREATEN TO DESTROY HIS CAMPAIGN.

Seriously. What the fuck.

A journalist up here recently wrote 'Where is our Obama?', pointing out that we haven't had a leader as engaging and dynamic as Obama since Pierre Elliot Trudeau. Notice that nothing is mentioned of race.

/rant 

Powered by LiveJournal.com